A British court rules again against a request from the parents of Archie Battersbee, the brain-dead boy

a court british has rejected the request of the parents of a boy in a coma to transfer him to a hospice once the doctors at the hospital where he is located remove the equipment that keeps him alive.

The parents quickly asked the Court of Appeal in London for permission to appeal the ruling, prolonging the legal battle over childcare. Archie Batterbee. The 12-year-old has been in a coma since early April and doctors say he is brain dead.

Look: He thought his hands were itchy from using cleaning products and the medical diagnosis was not encouraging

“All our wishes as a family have been denied by the authorities,” the mother said, Holly Dancewhen the family asked permission to appeal. “We are broken, but we will continue to fight, because we love Archie and we refuse to give up.”

Friday’s ruling opens the door for doctors in the Royal London Hospital Remove the devices keeping Archie alive.

“Back to the start. I recognize the horror of what awaits Archie’s parents and family. Her unconditional love and dedication to Archie is the golden thread that runs through this entire case.”Judge Lucy Thies wrote. “I hope Archie is given the opportunity to die in peaceful circumstances, with the family he loved as much as the family evidently loves him.”

Archie’s care has led to a series of legal battles in which his parents tried to force the hospital to continue life-sustaining treatments. Doctors argue that he has no chance of recovery and that he should be allowed to die.

The family sought permission to transfer Archie to a hospice when British courts ruled it was in the boy’s best interest to end treatment and the European Court of Human Rights refrained from intervening. The hospital said Archie’s condition was so unstable that a transfer would hasten her death.

This is the latest case in Britain in which the doctors’ judgment goes against the wishes of the family. Under British law, courts often intervene when parents and doctors disagree about a child’s treatment. In these cases, what is most convenient for the child prevails over the parents’ right to decide what is best for their children.

Leave a Reply